|
Facilitating Case Discussion: Being a “reflective”
practitioner of Case Method
After each session, it is important for the facilitator to spend
time reflecting on the session. Which questions worked for you?
How well did they work for you? Did they accomplish the intended
purpose in the discussion? If you identified a “teaching buddy,”
be sure to follow up with him/her about any specific skills you
asked them to observe. It might be helpful to re-read this as part
of your systematic reflection on what worked and did not work for
you during this session. Consider what you will change the next
time you use this or another case.
Gregory S. Blaschke, M.D., M.P.H. and
Janet P. Hafler, Ed.D.
Bibliography:
Armstrong E. A hybrid model of problem-based
learning. In: Boud D, Feleui G, editors. The Challenge of Problem
Based Learning. London: Kogan Page Publishers; 1991. p. 137-149.
Armstrong E. Curriculum design. In: Adelstein SJ, Carver ST, editors.
New Pathways to Medical Education: Learning to Learn Medicine at
Harvard Medical School. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1994.
Barnes L, Christensen C, Hansen A. Teaching and the Case Method,
Third edition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1994.
Barnes L, Christensen C, Hansen A. Instructor’s Guide to Teaching
and the Case Method, Third edition. Boston: Harvard Business School
Press; 1994.
Napell S. Six common non-facilitating teaching behaviors. Contemporary
Education 1976;47(2):199-202.
Rogers C, Farson R. Active Listening. Seminar Program for Instructors
in Professional Schools; Cases and Readings. Chicago: University
of Chicago, Industrial Relations Center; 1994.
Schmidt H. The rational behind problem-based learning. Journal of
Medical Education 1983;17:11-16.
|
